https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48252 The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision that the Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) lacked jurisdiction over the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) and was not authorized to issue show-cause notices or adjudicate duty demands on goods cleared by the proper officer at the Bombay Customs House. The Court emphasized that jurisdiction over the EEZ was limited to specific officers designated under relevant notifications and laws. The Revenue's appeal was dismissed. en-us Mon, 04 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Dec 2014 19:18:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48252 The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision that the Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) lacked jurisdiction over the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) and was not authorized to issue show-cause notices or adjudicate duty demands on goods cleared by the proper officer at the Bombay Customs House. The Court emphasized that jurisdiction over the EEZ was limited to specific officers designated under relevant notifications and laws. The Revenue's appeal was dismissed. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 04 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48252