https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48250 The Court acknowledged the petitioner's concerns regarding the repeated summoning of their Managing Director to Varanasi for Customs Act proceedings but clarified it cannot dictate whom the Investigating Officer should summon. The Court allowed representations if any officer faced genuine difficulty attending summons. Regarding the lack of knowledge of the Managing Director about company operations in Varanasi, the Court directed the appropriate authority to consider the petitioner's representation and issue a reasoned order. The Court also instructed the examination of the traveling costs of witnesses, aiming to address financial implications. The writ petition was disposed of without requiring additional affidavits, with parties to receive a certified copy of the order. en-us Tue, 18 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Aug 2010 13:45:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48250 The Court acknowledged the petitioner's concerns regarding the repeated summoning of their Managing Director to Varanasi for Customs Act proceedings but clarified it cannot dictate whom the Investigating Officer should summon. The Court allowed representations if any officer faced genuine difficulty attending summons. Regarding the lack of knowledge of the Managing Director about company operations in Varanasi, the Court directed the appropriate authority to consider the petitioner's representation and issue a reasoned order. The Court also instructed the examination of the traveling costs of witnesses, aiming to address financial implications. The writ petition was disposed of without requiring additional affidavits, with parties to receive a certified copy of the order. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 18 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48250