<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 211 - HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48247</link>
    <description>Wilful failure to furnish information to the proper excise authority, together with non-compliance with the prescribed licensing and declaration procedure, amounted to suppression of facts. A letter sent only to a field officer was not valid disclosure to the competent authority, and the assessee&#039;s commencement of production without the required declaration supported that finding. The earlier view that there was no concealment was erroneous in law, so the demand was not time-barred and the Revenue succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2014 16:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86757" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 211 - HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48247</link>
      <description>Wilful failure to furnish information to the proper excise authority, together with non-compliance with the prescribed licensing and declaration procedure, amounted to suppression of facts. A letter sent only to a field officer was not valid disclosure to the competent authority, and the assessee&#039;s commencement of production without the required declaration supported that finding. The earlier view that there was no concealment was erroneous in law, so the demand was not time-barred and the Revenue succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48247</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>