https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48245 The court set aside the second respondent's order rejecting the petitioners' settlement applications and remanded the matter for full adjudication. The court directed the second respondent to utilize its powers under the Central Excise Act, 1944, for a thorough investigation if needed and to provide detailed findings. The court held that rejection based on the admitted amount, complexity of contentions, and lack of investigation was erroneous. The writ petitions were allowed, and connected miscellaneous petitions were closed without costs. en-us Tue, 15 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Dec 2014 11:03:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48245 The court set aside the second respondent's order rejecting the petitioners' settlement applications and remanded the matter for full adjudication. The court directed the second respondent to utilize its powers under the Central Excise Act, 1944, for a thorough investigation if needed and to provide detailed findings. The court held that rejection based on the admitted amount, complexity of contentions, and lack of investigation was erroneous. The writ petitions were allowed, and connected miscellaneous petitions were closed without costs. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 15 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48245