<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 1696 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782228</link>
    <description>Refunds arising directly from finalisation of provisional assessment are not subject to the bar of unjust enrichment applicable to independent refund claims, especially where the refund relates to a period before the relevant proviso came into force. The analysis followed the line of authority treating such refunds as adjustments under provisional assessment rather than separate refund claims, and noted that the departmental circular supported that view. The later challenge also failed because, once the earlier provisional-assessment order was upheld, the basis for to the refund disappeared. The refund remained payable with statutory interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2025 08:36:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=867546" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 1696 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782228</link>
      <description>Refunds arising directly from finalisation of provisional assessment are not subject to the bar of unjust enrichment applicable to independent refund claims, especially where the refund relates to a period before the relevant proviso came into force. The analysis followed the line of authority treating such refunds as adjustments under provisional assessment rather than separate refund claims, and noted that the departmental circular supported that view. The later challenge also failed because, once the earlier provisional-assessment order was upheld, the basis for to the refund disappeared. The refund remained payable with statutory interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782228</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>