<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (7) TMI 118 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY AT GOA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48244</link>
    <description>The Court found in favor of the petitioners, directing them to collectively deposit Rs. 50,00,000 towards excise duty within four weeks, instead of the 25% initially demanded. The Court split the deposit amount among the petitioners and instructed the Tribunal to expedite the appeal process by the end of October 2005. The judgment emphasized keeping the contentions of both parties open, and all petitions were disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 13:32:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86754" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (7) TMI 118 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY AT GOA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48244</link>
      <description>The Court found in favor of the petitioners, directing them to collectively deposit Rs. 50,00,000 towards excise duty within four weeks, instead of the 25% initially demanded. The Court split the deposit amount among the petitioners and instructed the Tribunal to expedite the appeal process by the end of October 2005. The judgment emphasized keeping the contentions of both parties open, and all petitions were disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48244</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>