https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782243 Writ jurisdiction was held inappropriate to bypass the PMLA's statutory remedy where the impugned action rested on tangible material and no exceptional ground for interference was shown. The Court accepted territorial jurisdiction because a substantial part of the cause of action arose in Delhi. It further held that the provisional attachment and show-cause notice were supported by a recorded reason to believe based on FIR material, a charge-sheet report, bank records, ledger entries and statements. The Court also treated digital login IDs as property capable of constituting proceeds of crime and rejected challenges based on alleged single-member functioning of the Adjudicating Authority or absence of prior attachment. en-us Mon, 24 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Nov 2025 08:36:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782243 Writ jurisdiction was held inappropriate to bypass the PMLA's statutory remedy where the impugned action rested on tangible material and no exceptional ground for interference was shown. The Court accepted territorial jurisdiction because a substantial part of the cause of action arose in Delhi. It further held that the provisional attachment and show-cause notice were supported by a recorded reason to believe based on FIR material, a charge-sheet report, bank records, ledger entries and statements. The Court also treated digital login IDs as property capable of constituting proceeds of crime and rejected challenges based on alleged single-member functioning of the Adjudicating Authority or absence of prior attachment. Case-Laws Money Laundering Mon, 24 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782243