<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 1719 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782251</link>
    <description>SAT Mumbai reduced a penalty imposed for non-compliance with summons after treating the appellant&#039;s youth, absence of prior violations and pleaded financial hardship as mitigating circumstances. It held that these factors justified reduction in the interests of justice, and also noted that part of the penalty had already been recovered by SEBI. The penalty was reduced to Rs. 2.5 lakhs, granting partial relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2025 08:36:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=867523" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 1719 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782251</link>
      <description>SAT Mumbai reduced a penalty imposed for non-compliance with summons after treating the appellant&#039;s youth, absence of prior violations and pleaded financial hardship as mitigating circumstances. It held that these factors justified reduction in the interests of justice, and also noted that part of the penalty had already been recovered by SEBI. The penalty was reduced to Rs. 2.5 lakhs, granting partial relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782251</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>