<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 234 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48241</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition, directing the respondent to pay interest on the delayed refund of Rs. 73,18,337/- from 26th August 1995 to 14th November 2005, as per Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The court found that the withholding of the refund based on unjust enrichment was unjustifiable following the Apex Court&#039;s decision. The respondent was ordered to pay the interest within 30 days of filing the certified copy of the order, with costs awarded to the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2024 16:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86751" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 234 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48241</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition, directing the respondent to pay interest on the delayed refund of Rs. 73,18,337/- from 26th August 1995 to 14th November 2005, as per Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The court found that the withholding of the refund based on unjust enrichment was unjustifiable following the Apex Court&#039;s decision. The respondent was ordered to pay the interest within 30 days of filing the certified copy of the order, with costs awarded to the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48241</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>