<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 1735 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782267</link>
    <description>Unlocking or activating mobile phones before export was treated as mere configuration to make the goods usable, and not as the goods having been &quot;taken into use&quot; under the drawback rules; on that interpretation, drawback remained available. A clarificatory circular taking the contrary view was held unsustainable in light of the binding High Court interpretation. The article also notes that a show-cause notice issued more than four years after the export-related events, without adequate justification, made the resulting demand and penal proceedings unsustainable. The adjudication order was consequently set aside and relief followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2025 08:36:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=867507" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 1735 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782267</link>
      <description>Unlocking or activating mobile phones before export was treated as mere configuration to make the goods usable, and not as the goods having been &quot;taken into use&quot; under the drawback rules; on that interpretation, drawback remained available. A clarificatory circular taking the contrary view was held unsustainable in light of the binding High Court interpretation. The article also notes that a show-cause notice issued more than four years after the export-related events, without adequate justification, made the resulting demand and penal proceedings unsustainable. The adjudication order was consequently set aside and relief followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782267</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>