<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 1765 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782297</link>
    <description>ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s claim for deduction u/s 80IA following its own order in an earlier AY. On disallowance u/s 14A r.w. Rule 8D and its impact on book profits u/s 115JB for AYs 2017-18 and 2018-19, ITAT remanded the matter to the AO to recompute disallowance as per the amended Rule 8D, restricting it to 1% of the average investments actually yielding exempt income, after determining the actual exempt income. Provision for leave encashment, gratuity and post-retirement medical benefits, being actuarially determined present liabilities, was held allowable and not an unascertained liability for MAT purposes. Deletion by CIT(A) of disallowance relating to depreciation on amortization of land u/s 115JB was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2025 08:36:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=867477" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 1765 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782297</link>
      <description>ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s claim for deduction u/s 80IA following its own order in an earlier AY. On disallowance u/s 14A r.w. Rule 8D and its impact on book profits u/s 115JB for AYs 2017-18 and 2018-19, ITAT remanded the matter to the AO to recompute disallowance as per the amended Rule 8D, restricting it to 1% of the average investments actually yielding exempt income, after determining the actual exempt income. Provision for leave encashment, gratuity and post-retirement medical benefits, being actuarially determined present liabilities, was held allowable and not an unascertained liability for MAT purposes. Deletion by CIT(A) of disallowance relating to depreciation on amortization of land u/s 115JB was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782297</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>