<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (3) TMI 280 - HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48236</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to reduce the penalty imposed on a manufacturing company for short payment of excise duty. The Tribunal reduced the penalty from Rs. 35 Lakhs to Rs. 2 Lakhs, considering that the company had paid the entire duty amount with interest and there was no mens rea involved. The Court supported the Tribunal&#039;s interpretation that a penalty equal to duty is not mandatory unless there is intentional wrongdoing, citing a previous Supreme Court ruling. The Court dismissed the reference without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 13:16:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86746" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (3) TMI 280 - HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48236</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to reduce the penalty imposed on a manufacturing company for short payment of excise duty. The Tribunal reduced the penalty from Rs. 35 Lakhs to Rs. 2 Lakhs, considering that the company had paid the entire duty amount with interest and there was no mens rea involved. The Court supported the Tribunal&#039;s interpretation that a penalty equal to duty is not mandatory unless there is intentional wrongdoing, citing a previous Supreme Court ruling. The Court dismissed the reference without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48236</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>