<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 1792 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782324</link>
    <description>SC considered a review petition challenging an HC order upholding proceedings under Section 74 of the CGST Act, 2017 for failure to pay GST and file returns within time, and alleged contravention of Section 37. The petitioner contended absence of suppression of facts and questioned applicability of penalty provisions. SC found no error apparent or sufficient ground to reopen the HC decision and held that there was no reason to interfere with the impugned order. The review petition was found devoid of merit and was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2025 08:36:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=867450" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 1792 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782324</link>
      <description>SC considered a review petition challenging an HC order upholding proceedings under Section 74 of the CGST Act, 2017 for failure to pay GST and file returns within time, and alleged contravention of Section 37. The petitioner contended absence of suppression of facts and questioned applicability of penalty provisions. SC found no error apparent or sufficient ground to reopen the HC decision and held that there was no reason to interfere with the impugned order. The review petition was found devoid of merit and was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782324</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>