<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 320 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48234</link>
    <description>HC dismissed the appeal. The court held that a redemption fine under s.125 can be imposed where goods were released on execution of a bond, treating the goods as effectively available, but that principle does not permit automatic fines in all under-valuation cases. Here the imported second-hand computers/laptops were cleared without any bond or undertaking, so s.125 did not apply. Given these facts and the impugned orders, HC found no error or substantial question of law and dismissed the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2025 11:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86744" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 320 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48234</link>
      <description>HC dismissed the appeal. The court held that a redemption fine under s.125 can be imposed where goods were released on execution of a bond, treating the goods as effectively available, but that principle does not permit automatic fines in all under-valuation cases. Here the imported second-hand computers/laptops were cleared without any bond or undertaking, so s.125 did not apply. Given these facts and the impugned orders, HC found no error or substantial question of law and dismissed the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48234</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>