<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 1275 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464960</link>
    <description>A collateral challenge to a recovery notice implementing a final disgorgement direction was not maintainable after the underlying order had already been unsuccessfully challenged and reviewed. The notice correctly enforced the earlier disgorgement order, including interest accruing from default in payment within the stipulated period, because the original direction had attained finality. The recovery action was therefore upheld and the appeal failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2025 18:22:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=867412" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 1275 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464960</link>
      <description>A collateral challenge to a recovery notice implementing a final disgorgement direction was not maintainable after the underlying order had already been unsuccessfully challenged and reviewed. The notice correctly enforced the earlier disgorgement order, including interest accruing from default in payment within the stipulated period, because the original direction had attained finality. The recovery action was therefore upheld and the appeal failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464960</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>