<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Plea that SIR of electoral rolls wasn&#039;t held earlier not ground to challenge: SC</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=62835</link>
    <description>The court held that the novelty of the special intensive revision does not invalidate the Election Commission&#039;s decision; the Commission has an inherent power to determine the correctness of entries in Form 6. Inclusion on electoral rolls carries a presumption of validity, deletions require notice and a fair process, and Aadhaar is admissible as one document but not conclusive proof of citizenship.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2025 18:46:03 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2025 18:46:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=867405" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Plea that SIR of electoral rolls wasn&#039;t held earlier not ground to challenge: SC</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=62835</link>
      <description>The court held that the novelty of the special intensive revision does not invalidate the Election Commission&#039;s decision; the Commission has an inherent power to determine the correctness of entries in Form 6. Inclusion on electoral rolls carries a presumption of validity, deletions require notice and a fair process, and Aadhaar is admissible as one document but not conclusive proof of citizenship.</description>
      <category>News</category>
      <law>-</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2025 18:46:03 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=62835</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>