<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 401 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48228</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the Commissioner&#039;s order, ruling in favor of the Revenue and confirming the demand for Bills of Entry Nos. 930 and 2440. The Court determined that the goods covered under the DEPB scheme did not qualify for benefits under Notification No. 94/96-Cus. The appeal was allowed with costs, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2016 14:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86739" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 401 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48228</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the Commissioner&#039;s order, ruling in favor of the Revenue and confirming the demand for Bills of Entry Nos. 930 and 2440. The Court determined that the goods covered under the DEPB scheme did not qualify for benefits under Notification No. 94/96-Cus. The appeal was allowed with costs, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48228</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>