https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48217 The High Court dismissed the writ petition due to lack of territorial jurisdiction, as both the original assessment order and the impugned order were from Mumbai. The Court noted that the Assessee, a private limited company, could have been represented by an authorized person, making the Managing Director's physical presence unnecessary. The High Court did not address the maintainability of the writ petition but granted liberty to the Petitioner to seek relief from the Bombay High Court. en-us Thu, 13 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Aug 2010 12:23:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48217 The High Court dismissed the writ petition due to lack of territorial jurisdiction, as both the original assessment order and the impugned order were from Mumbai. The Court noted that the Assessee, a private limited company, could have been represented by an authorized person, making the Managing Director's physical presence unnecessary. The High Court did not address the maintainability of the writ petition but granted liberty to the Petitioner to seek relief from the Bombay High Court. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 13 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48217