<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 255 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48216</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal. The Court found no grounds to interfere with the Tribunal&#039;s ruling, affirming that the Tribunal correctly considered the merits of the case and did not need to remand it back to the Commissioner (Appeals). The Court concluded that no substantial legal question was raised, leading to the dismissal of the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 12:14:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86727" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 255 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48216</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal. The Court found no grounds to interfere with the Tribunal&#039;s ruling, affirming that the Tribunal correctly considered the merits of the case and did not need to remand it back to the Commissioner (Appeals). The Court concluded that no substantial legal question was raised, leading to the dismissal of the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48216</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>