https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782175 HC held that the third member of the Tribunal was right in concluding that the appeals against the interlocutory orders dated 15 November 2017 and 30 October 2017, alleging denial of cross-examination and recall of witnesses, were not maintainable. The HC clarified that if the Adjudicating Authority ultimately decides against the appellants on the show cause notice, the appellants may raise all grounds relating to alleged violation of natural justice, including denial of cross-examination, in any appeal against the final order. The Tribunal was directed to consider such grounds uninfluenced by the order dated 26 July 2019. The appeals were disposed of and adjudication directed to proceed without further delay. en-us Fri, 14 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Nov 2025 08:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782175 HC held that the third member of the Tribunal was right in concluding that the appeals against the interlocutory orders dated 15 November 2017 and 30 October 2017, alleging denial of cross-examination and recall of witnesses, were not maintainable. The HC clarified that if the Adjudicating Authority ultimately decides against the appellants on the show cause notice, the appellants may raise all grounds relating to alleged violation of natural justice, including denial of cross-examination, in any appeal against the final order. The Tribunal was directed to consider such grounds uninfluenced by the order dated 26 July 2019. The appeals were disposed of and adjudication directed to proceed without further delay. Case-Laws FEMA Fri, 14 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782175