https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782176 HC allowed the appeal filed by the investigative agency and set aside the Single Judge's order dated 23.04.2024. It held that the direction making the investigation report subject to prior court scrutiny, and reserving to the court the prerogative to direct prosecution against respondents, was contrary to the statutory scheme and amounted to an impermissible arrogation of powers vested in the designated authority under the Act. Reiterating that courts cannot interdict or divert a lawfully ordered investigation, HC restored the position that the appellant must proceed strictly as per statute. Appeal disposed of. en-us Fri, 21 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Nov 2025 08:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782176 HC allowed the appeal filed by the investigative agency and set aside the Single Judge's order dated 23.04.2024. It held that the direction making the investigation report subject to prior court scrutiny, and reserving to the court the prerogative to direct prosecution against respondents, was contrary to the statutory scheme and amounted to an impermissible arrogation of powers vested in the designated authority under the Act. Reiterating that courts cannot interdict or divert a lawfully ordered investigation, HC restored the position that the appellant must proceed strictly as per statute. Appeal disposed of. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 21 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782176