<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 1646 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782178</link>
    <description>Rule 22 of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1982 provides that an appeal abates on the death of a party unless a legal representative or successor-in-interest applies for continuance within the prescribed time. No such application was made after the appellant&#039;s death, so the appeal abated. As proceedings cannot be continued against a dead person, the connected departmental appeal also abated consequentially.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2025 13:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=867236" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 1646 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782178</link>
      <description>Rule 22 of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1982 provides that an appeal abates on the death of a party unless a legal representative or successor-in-interest applies for continuance within the prescribed time. No such application was made after the appellant&#039;s death, so the appeal abated. As proceedings cannot be continued against a dead person, the connected departmental appeal also abated consequentially.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782178</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>