https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782181 CESTAT New Delhi allowed the appeal of the customs broker against revocation of its licence and forfeiture of security deposit. The proceedings were initiated on the allegation that the broker, in conspiracy with exporters and customs officers, facilitated issuance of Let Export Orders before goods were brought into the customs area, allegedly violating Regulations 10(d), 10(e), 10(f) and 10(i) of the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2018. CESTAT noted that the core allegation regarding premature LEOs had already been dropped in the underlying offence reports. Consequently, the foundation for action under CBLR no longer existed, rendering the revocation order unsustainable, which was therefore set aside. en-us Mon, 19 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Nov 2025 08:43:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782181 CESTAT New Delhi allowed the appeal of the customs broker against revocation of its licence and forfeiture of security deposit. The proceedings were initiated on the allegation that the broker, in conspiracy with exporters and customs officers, facilitated issuance of Let Export Orders before goods were brought into the customs area, allegedly violating Regulations 10(d), 10(e), 10(f) and 10(i) of the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2018. CESTAT noted that the core allegation regarding premature LEOs had already been dropped in the underlying offence reports. Consequently, the foundation for action under CBLR no longer existed, rendering the revocation order unsustainable, which was therefore set aside. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 19 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782181