https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782187 HC held that the appeal involved issues not addressed by CESTAT, particularly regarding permission for re-testing of the goods' samples and the merits of the application for such re-testing. Noting that these questions were not discussed in the impugned orders, HC found that they must be considered on merits by CESTAT. While observing laxity by the appellant in not filing written submissions and repeatedly seeking adjournments, HC nonetheless granted another opportunity. The appellant was directed to appear before CESTAT on 15 December 2025, and the petition was disposed of. en-us Wed, 19 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Nov 2025 14:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782187 HC held that the appeal involved issues not addressed by CESTAT, particularly regarding permission for re-testing of the goods' samples and the merits of the application for such re-testing. Noting that these questions were not discussed in the impugned orders, HC found that they must be considered on merits by CESTAT. While observing laxity by the appellant in not filing written submissions and repeatedly seeking adjournments, HC nonetheless granted another opportunity. The appellant was directed to appear before CESTAT on 15 December 2025, and the petition was disposed of. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 19 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782187