<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 1681 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782213</link>
    <description>Special Leave Petitions on tax liability and the applicable rate of tax were treated differently depending on whether the dispute still survived between the parties. In the connected matters, the Supreme Court directed the cases to be listed for further hearing. In the detached Special Leave Petitions, the Court disposed of the matters because the lis between the parties no longer survived for consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2025 08:43:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=867201" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 1681 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782213</link>
      <description>Special Leave Petitions on tax liability and the applicable rate of tax were treated differently depending on whether the dispute still survived between the parties. In the connected matters, the Supreme Court directed the cases to be listed for further hearing. In the detached Special Leave Petitions, the Court disposed of the matters because the lis between the parties no longer survived for consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782213</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>