https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782218 The Madras HC dealt with a GST adjudication order challenged after expiry of the appeal period. Taking note that the taxpayer had not used the personal hearing opportunity in the show cause proceedings, the Court considered it appropriate to interfere and remit the matter for fresh adjudication on merits. The remand was made conditional on the taxpayer depositing 10% of the disputed tax in cash and filing a reply with supporting documents, treating the impugned order as an addendum to the show cause notice. The bank attachment was directed to be vacated upon compliance. en-us Thu, 20 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Nov 2025 08:43:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782218 The Madras HC dealt with a GST adjudication order challenged after expiry of the appeal period. Taking note that the taxpayer had not used the personal hearing opportunity in the show cause proceedings, the Court considered it appropriate to interfere and remit the matter for fresh adjudication on merits. The remand was made conditional on the taxpayer depositing 10% of the disputed tax in cash and filing a reply with supporting documents, treating the impugned order as an addendum to the show cause notice. The bank attachment was directed to be vacated upon compliance. Case-Laws GST Thu, 20 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782218