https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782219 HC quashed the order cancelling the petitioner's GST registration, holding that the authority had passed a non-speaking order by merely stating that the reply was "not satisfactory" without disclosing any reasons. Such absence of reasoning was found to be in complete violation of basic principles of procedural law, especially given the severe economic consequences of cancellation, including inability to issue tax invoices or avail and pass on ITC. The impugned cancellation order was set aside, and the matter directed to be communicated to the Commissioner, Commercial Tax, Uttar Pradesh within one week. Petition allowed. en-us Thu, 20 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Nov 2025 14:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782219 HC quashed the order cancelling the petitioner's GST registration, holding that the authority had passed a non-speaking order by merely stating that the reply was "not satisfactory" without disclosing any reasons. Such absence of reasoning was found to be in complete violation of basic principles of procedural law, especially given the severe economic consequences of cancellation, including inability to issue tax invoices or avail and pass on ITC. The impugned cancellation order was set aside, and the matter directed to be communicated to the Commissioner, Commercial Tax, Uttar Pradesh within one week. Petition allowed. Case-Laws GST Thu, 20 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782219