https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=62674 The Supreme Court declined to legislate or monitor every incident of alleged hate speech, stressing judicial restraint and directing the applicant to seek action through existing legislative measures, police mechanisms or the concerned high court; the Solicitor General urged non-selective public interest advocacy and offered to provide comparative instances of inflammatory speech for a pan-community pleading. en-us Tue, 25 Nov 2025 16:01:02 +0530 Tue, 25 Nov 2025 16:01:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=62674 The Supreme Court declined to legislate or monitor every incident of alleged hate speech, stressing judicial restraint and directing the applicant to seek action through existing legislative measures, police mechanisms or the concerned high court; the Solicitor General urged non-selective public interest advocacy and offered to provide comparative instances of inflammatory speech for a pan-community pleading. News - Tue, 25 Nov 2025 16:01:02 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=62674