<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 401 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48192</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal by the Commissioner of Central Excise Commissionerate concerning penalties under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Court found the penalties imposed by the Tribunal on M/s Aravali India Ltd. to be appropriate, emphasizing the lack of evidence of mens rea and the need for penalties to be judiciously imposed. The Court highlighted the discretionary nature of penalties and the importance of not imposing them for technical breaches or genuine belief contrary to statutory obligations. The appeal was dismissed as the question raised did not apply to the respondent/assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2014 17:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86703" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 401 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48192</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal by the Commissioner of Central Excise Commissionerate concerning penalties under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Court found the penalties imposed by the Tribunal on M/s Aravali India Ltd. to be appropriate, emphasizing the lack of evidence of mens rea and the need for penalties to be judiciously imposed. The Court highlighted the discretionary nature of penalties and the importance of not imposing them for technical breaches or genuine belief contrary to statutory obligations. The appeal was dismissed as the question raised did not apply to the respondent/assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48192</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>