<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 400 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48191</link>
    <description>Regulation 20(2) permits immediate suspension of a Customs House Agent licence only when urgent action is necessary. Where the alleged import violation had occurred earlier, the suspension was issued much later, and no show cause notice had been served, the note states that the emergency power could not be invoked. The absence of an emergent situation meant the suspension order was not justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2017 09:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86702" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 400 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48191</link>
      <description>Regulation 20(2) permits immediate suspension of a Customs House Agent licence only when urgent action is necessary. Where the alleged import violation had occurred earlier, the suspension was issued much later, and no show cause notice had been served, the note states that the emergency power could not be invoked. The absence of an emergent situation meant the suspension order was not justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48191</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>