<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 400 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48191</link>
    <description>The High Court of Judicature at Bombay dismissed the appeal challenging the suspension of a CHA licence for a violation in 2004 related to an import in September 2005. The court held that the lack of an emergency at the time of the suspension in 2006 and the absence of a show cause notice to the respondents resulted in the appeal being dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2017 09:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86702" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 400 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48191</link>
      <description>The High Court of Judicature at Bombay dismissed the appeal challenging the suspension of a CHA licence for a violation in 2004 related to an import in September 2005. The court held that the lack of an emergency at the time of the suspension in 2006 and the absence of a show cause notice to the respondents resulted in the appeal being dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48191</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>