<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 1545 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782077</link>
    <description>CESTAT held that VAT/CST amounts reimbursed by the Andhra Pradesh Government as incentive/grant to the appellant are not includible in the assessable value under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Relying on prior CESTAT decisions, it found that such subsidies are not additional consideration, do not affect the selling price, and that VAT actually paid is excludible from transaction value. Consequently, the demand based on inclusion of these incentives failed on merits. The Tribunal also held there was no suppression of facts, rendering the extended period of limitation inapplicable. The appeal was allowed both on merits and on limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2025 08:55:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=867002" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 1545 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782077</link>
      <description>CESTAT held that VAT/CST amounts reimbursed by the Andhra Pradesh Government as incentive/grant to the appellant are not includible in the assessable value under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Relying on prior CESTAT decisions, it found that such subsidies are not additional consideration, do not affect the selling price, and that VAT actually paid is excludible from transaction value. Consequently, the demand based on inclusion of these incentives failed on merits. The Tribunal also held there was no suppression of facts, rendering the extended period of limitation inapplicable. The appeal was allowed both on merits and on limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782077</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>