https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782092 The NCLAT held that an application for recall cannot be used to enforce a compromise order or avoid execution proceedings. Recall is limited to correcting orders passed due to inadvertent errors by the Tribunal or parties, and cannot be invoked against a final consent order, especially one induced and accepted by the applicant. The appellant's attempt to restore the company petition under Rule 11 of the NCLT Rules, citing non-compliance with the compromise dated 25.09.2018 and subsequent compromise on 10.12.2019, was found untenable. The Tribunal concluded that the appeal was a misuse of process and dismissed it. en-us Thu, 20 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Nov 2025 08:55:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782092 The NCLAT held that an application for recall cannot be used to enforce a compromise order or avoid execution proceedings. Recall is limited to correcting orders passed due to inadvertent errors by the Tribunal or parties, and cannot be invoked against a final consent order, especially one induced and accepted by the applicant. The appellant's attempt to restore the company petition under Rule 11 of the NCLT Rules, citing non-compliance with the compromise dated 25.09.2018 and subsequent compromise on 10.12.2019, was found untenable. The Tribunal concluded that the appeal was a misuse of process and dismissed it. Case-Laws IBC Thu, 20 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782092