https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782138 ITAT Kolkata dismissed the assessee's appeals, proceeding ex parte due to repeated non-appearance and non-cooperation. On the addition u/s 68 relating to cash deposits during demonetization, the Tribunal noted that despite specific directions, the assessee failed to furnish supporting documents such as bills, vouchers, invoices, transport and weighment receipts. On the issue of bogus purchases from a named supplier, ITAT found that the department had cogent evidence and the assessee produced none before AO, CIT(A) or ITAT. Finding no ground to disturb the findings, ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s order in full. en-us Mon, 17 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Nov 2025 08:55:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782138 ITAT Kolkata dismissed the assessee's appeals, proceeding ex parte due to repeated non-appearance and non-cooperation. On the addition u/s 68 relating to cash deposits during demonetization, the Tribunal noted that despite specific directions, the assessee failed to furnish supporting documents such as bills, vouchers, invoices, transport and weighment receipts. On the issue of bogus purchases from a named supplier, ITAT found that the department had cogent evidence and the assessee produced none before AO, CIT(A) or ITAT. Finding no ground to disturb the findings, ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s order in full. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 17 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782138