<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 1607 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782139</link>
    <description>Bank deposits were found not to be unexplained money under section 69A because the assessee substantiated an existing retail liquor business with prior assessment records, licence fee documents and an audited balance sheet showing receivables. In the absence of any adverse material discrediting the business or the receivables, the realization of those receivables was accepted as an explained source for the deposits. On that basis, the addition was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2025 08:55:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=866940" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 1607 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782139</link>
      <description>Bank deposits were found not to be unexplained money under section 69A because the assessee substantiated an existing retail liquor business with prior assessment records, licence fee documents and an audited balance sheet showing receivables. In the absence of any adverse material discrediting the business or the receivables, the realization of those receivables was accepted as an explained source for the deposits. On that basis, the addition was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782139</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>