<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 1619 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782151</link>
    <description>Reopening of assessment was challenged on the ground that the AO&#039;s recorded reasons lacked independent application of mind and were merely a reproduction of an investigation report alleging bogus LTCG and accommodation entries through alleged shell entities. The HC held that such reasons do not satisfy the statutory requirement of &quot;reason to believe&quot; because the AO must form an independent belief on relevant material; consequently, the reassessment and related additions were unsustainable. The SC dismissed the revenue&#039;s SLP both on delay and on merits, thereby affirming the HC&#039;s quashing of the reopening and consequential additions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2025 10:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=866928" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 1619 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782151</link>
      <description>Reopening of assessment was challenged on the ground that the AO&#039;s recorded reasons lacked independent application of mind and were merely a reproduction of an investigation report alleging bogus LTCG and accommodation entries through alleged shell entities. The HC held that such reasons do not satisfy the statutory requirement of &quot;reason to believe&quot; because the AO must form an independent belief on relevant material; consequently, the reassessment and related additions were unsustainable. The SC dismissed the revenue&#039;s SLP both on delay and on merits, thereby affirming the HC&#039;s quashing of the reopening and consequential additions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782151</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>