<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 1620 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782152</link>
    <description>The dominant issue was the validity of reassessment notices issued under the post-2021 regime in light of limitation under s. 149 read with TOLA, particularly whether the extended 10-year period could be invoked for AY 2021-22 and earlier despite expiry of the 6-year period under the pre-amendment regime. Applying the binding ratio in a prior SC decision, the Court held that issuance of notice under s. 148 is barred where the pre-amendment 6-year limitation had already expired on the date of notice, and the amended 10-year window under s. 149 operates prospectively. The revenue&#039;s SLPs were disposed of accordingly, with objections to be decided by the AO per SC law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2025 10:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=866927" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 1620 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782152</link>
      <description>The dominant issue was the validity of reassessment notices issued under the post-2021 regime in light of limitation under s. 149 read with TOLA, particularly whether the extended 10-year period could be invoked for AY 2021-22 and earlier despite expiry of the 6-year period under the pre-amendment regime. Applying the binding ratio in a prior SC decision, the Court held that issuance of notice under s. 148 is barred where the pre-amendment 6-year limitation had already expired on the date of notice, and the amended 10-year window under s. 149 operates prospectively. The revenue&#039;s SLPs were disposed of accordingly, with objections to be decided by the AO per SC law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782152</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>