https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464932 The Tribunal sustained the findings of violations against an unregistered investment advisory entity and connected persons, and confined the remand to determination of the actual amount received towards investment advisory services because the appellants had not produced documents establishing the source and extent of receipts. It also treated the admitted receipt of about Rs. 60 lakh as a fair basis for interim protection and directed that sum to be placed in a fixed deposit with lien in favour of SEBI pending reconsideration. en-us Wed, 26 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Nov 2025 18:58:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464932 The Tribunal sustained the findings of violations against an unregistered investment advisory entity and connected persons, and confined the remand to determination of the actual amount received towards investment advisory services because the appellants had not produced documents establishing the source and extent of receipts. It also treated the admitted receipt of about Rs. 60 lakh as a fair basis for interim protection and directed that sum to be placed in a fixed deposit with lien in favour of SEBI pending reconsideration. Case-Laws SEBI Wed, 26 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464932