<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (7) TMI 320 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48175</link>
    <description>The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal against an order regarding clandestine removal of goods and duty payment. The Tribunal found that the appellants admitted to the removal of goods without payment of duty, failed to produce duty paying documents, and did not contest shortages in stock. The partners&#039; statements and packing slips supported the removal without duty payment. The Tribunal concluded fraudulent conduct due to lack of contestation and upheld the decision based on established facts, emphasizing the importance of partners&#039; statements and immediate duty payment upon detection. The appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 10:41:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86687" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (7) TMI 320 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48175</link>
      <description>The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal against an order regarding clandestine removal of goods and duty payment. The Tribunal found that the appellants admitted to the removal of goods without payment of duty, failed to produce duty paying documents, and did not contest shortages in stock. The partners&#039; statements and packing slips supported the removal without duty payment. The Tribunal concluded fraudulent conduct due to lack of contestation and upheld the decision based on established facts, emphasizing the importance of partners&#039; statements and immediate duty payment upon detection. The appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48175</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>