<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (11) TMI 312 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48165</link>
    <description>The High Court quashed the complaint and proceedings against the accused company, emphasizing the exoneration on merits by CEGAT and the identical facts and evidence in both departmental and criminal proceedings as grounds for ending the criminal prosecution. The judgment underscored the significance of exoneration in departmental proceedings and its influence on criminal prosecution, resulting in the termination of the case against the accused company to uphold principles of justice and consistency in legal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2014 10:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86677" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (11) TMI 312 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48165</link>
      <description>The High Court quashed the complaint and proceedings against the accused company, emphasizing the exoneration on merits by CEGAT and the identical facts and evidence in both departmental and criminal proceedings as grounds for ending the criminal prosecution. The judgment underscored the significance of exoneration in departmental proceedings and its influence on criminal prosecution, resulting in the termination of the case against the accused company to uphold principles of justice and consistency in legal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48165</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>