<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>How to interpret Section 74 of the CGST Act, 2017</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=15469</link>
    <description>Section 74 is properly invoked only where material evidence shows fraud, wilful mis statement or suppression of facts to evade tax; such evidence must be part of the show cause notice. Mere non payment, lesser payment, or disputed interpretation leading to ineligible input tax credit is not sufficient to trigger the extended limitation regime absent a factual finding of intent to evade.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2025 09:39:13 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2025 09:39:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=866768" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>How to interpret Section 74 of the CGST Act, 2017</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=15469</link>
      <description>Section 74 is properly invoked only where material evidence shows fraud, wilful mis statement or suppression of facts to evade tax; such evidence must be part of the show cause notice. Mere non payment, lesser payment, or disputed interpretation leading to ineligible input tax credit is not sufficient to trigger the extended limitation regime absent a factual finding of intent to evade.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Goods and Services Tax - GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2025 09:39:13 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=15469</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>