https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464931 HC allowed the petition, holding that the issue was covered by earlier decisions concerning works contracts straddling the pre-GST (KVAT) and post-GST regimes. It reiterated that employers/respondents must reimburse the differential GST burden where contracts were entered under KVAT but executed or paid under GST, following the prescribed procedure to determine amounts payable. Applying this principle, HC directed respondents to reimburse the GST amounts claimed in the petitioner's specified representations, together with applicable interest, within four weeks of receiving the order. The petition was accordingly allowed. en-us Tue, 13 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Nov 2025 08:58:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464931 HC allowed the petition, holding that the issue was covered by earlier decisions concerning works contracts straddling the pre-GST (KVAT) and post-GST regimes. It reiterated that employers/respondents must reimburse the differential GST burden where contracts were entered under KVAT but executed or paid under GST, following the prescribed procedure to determine amounts payable. Applying this principle, HC directed respondents to reimburse the GST amounts claimed in the petitioner's specified representations, together with applicable interest, within four weeks of receiving the order. The petition was accordingly allowed. Case-Laws GST Tue, 13 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464931