<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 253 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48162</link>
    <description>The court directed the appellant to deposit Rs. 10 lacs by a specified date for the appeal to be revived and decided on merits by the Tribunal. Failure to comply would uphold the dismissal order. The court clarified that the decision should not serve as a precedent due to specific circumstances and concessions made in the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 10:20:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86674" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 253 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48162</link>
      <description>The court directed the appellant to deposit Rs. 10 lacs by a specified date for the appeal to be revived and decided on merits by the Tribunal. Failure to comply would uphold the dismissal order. The court clarified that the decision should not serve as a precedent due to specific circumstances and concessions made in the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48162</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>