<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Belated Form 10B filing is procedural; trust with s.12A registration entitled to s.11 exemption, return under s.139(4).</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94446</link>
    <description>The ITAT held that the denial of exemption u/s 11 to Assessee Trust A, already registered u/s 12A, on the sole ground of belated filing of Form 10B was unsustainable. The Tribunal noted that the return was filed within the extended statutory time u/s 139(4) pursuant to an Order u/s 119(2)(a), and the audit report in Form 10B, though delayed, was subsequently filed. Such delay was treated as a procedural irregularity amounting to substantial compliance with s.12A(1)(b), not warranting forfeiture of exemption. Emphasizing liberal interpretation of beneficial provisions for charitable entities, the ITAT held the CPC was not justified in taxing gross receipts and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2025 08:57:51 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2025 08:57:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=866739" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Belated Form 10B filing is procedural; trust with s.12A registration entitled to s.11 exemption, return under s.139(4).</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94446</link>
      <description>The ITAT held that the denial of exemption u/s 11 to Assessee Trust A, already registered u/s 12A, on the sole ground of belated filing of Form 10B was unsustainable. The Tribunal noted that the return was filed within the extended statutory time u/s 139(4) pursuant to an Order u/s 119(2)(a), and the audit report in Form 10B, though delayed, was subsequently filed. Such delay was treated as a procedural irregularity amounting to substantial compliance with s.12A(1)(b), not warranting forfeiture of exemption. Emphasizing liberal interpretation of beneficial provisions for charitable entities, the ITAT held the CPC was not justified in taxing gross receipts and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2025 08:57:51 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94446</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>