<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>ITAT quashes revision u/s 263 and time-barred reassessment; deletes unjustified cash credit addition u/s 68</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94444</link>
    <description>ITAT held that the Pr.CIT&#039;s revision u/s 263 and consequential addition u/s 68 for unexplained cash credits were unsustainable. The assessee had furnished complete evidences establishing identity, genuineness and creditworthiness of share subscribers, including responses to notices u/s 133(6) and compliance with summons u/s 131, with payments made through banking channels. Mere non-traceability of some subscribers at later dates could not justify addition u/s 68 in absence of contrary material. ITAT further held that reassessment proceedings initiated u/s 147/148 were barred by limitation, as the original assessment u/s 143(3) had examined and accepted the disclosed transactions and losses, leaving no failure to fully and truly disclose material facts. The reassessment was quashed and the assessee&#039;s appeal allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2025 08:57:51 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2025 08:57:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=866737" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>ITAT quashes revision u/s 263 and time-barred reassessment; deletes unjustified cash credit addition u/s 68</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94444</link>
      <description>ITAT held that the Pr.CIT&#039;s revision u/s 263 and consequential addition u/s 68 for unexplained cash credits were unsustainable. The assessee had furnished complete evidences establishing identity, genuineness and creditworthiness of share subscribers, including responses to notices u/s 133(6) and compliance with summons u/s 131, with payments made through banking channels. Mere non-traceability of some subscribers at later dates could not justify addition u/s 68 in absence of contrary material. ITAT further held that reassessment proceedings initiated u/s 147/148 were barred by limitation, as the original assessment u/s 143(3) had examined and accepted the disclosed transactions and losses, leaving no failure to fully and truly disclose material facts. The reassessment was quashed and the assessee&#039;s appeal allowed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2025 08:57:51 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94444</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>