https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781958 HC, exercising limited revisional jurisdiction in a cheque dishonour case under section 138 N.I. Act, upheld the concurrent findings of the Trial Court and Revisional Court. It held there was no perversity, patent illegality, or non-consideration of material evidence affecting the conviction. The courts below had correctly applied statutory presumptions, considered the defence that the cheque was obtained under duress and that there was no valid transaction, and given reasons for rejecting those defences. Finding the conviction legally sustainable and the orders not "evasive", HC declined to interfere. The revision petition was dismissed and the conviction maintained. en-us Wed, 19 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Nov 2025 08:57:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781958 HC, exercising limited revisional jurisdiction in a cheque dishonour case under section 138 N.I. Act, upheld the concurrent findings of the Trial Court and Revisional Court. It held there was no perversity, patent illegality, or non-consideration of material evidence affecting the conviction. The courts below had correctly applied statutory presumptions, considered the defence that the cheque was obtained under duress and that there was no valid transaction, and given reasons for rejecting those defences. Finding the conviction legally sustainable and the orders not "evasive", HC declined to interfere. The revision petition was dismissed and the conviction maintained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 19 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781958