https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781958 Execution and signature on the cheque being admitted, the statutory presumption of a legally enforceable liability under the Negotiable Instruments Act continued unless rebutted by probable and cogent evidence. A bare allegation of coercion, fraud, or undue influence, unsupported by independent material or financial records, was insufficient to displace that presumption. The court also found no perversity or patent illegality in the evidence assessment below; minor omissions as to the place of signing or issuance were immaterial. The conviction and sentence under Section 138 read with Section 141 were therefore upheld, and the revisional challenge failed. en-us Wed, 19 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Nov 2025 08:57:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781958 Execution and signature on the cheque being admitted, the statutory presumption of a legally enforceable liability under the Negotiable Instruments Act continued unless rebutted by probable and cogent evidence. A bare allegation of coercion, fraud, or undue influence, unsupported by independent material or financial records, was insufficient to displace that presumption. The court also found no perversity or patent illegality in the evidence assessment below; minor omissions as to the place of signing or issuance were immaterial. The conviction and sentence under Section 138 read with Section 141 were therefore upheld, and the revisional challenge failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 19 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781958