https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48159 The judgment addressed the issue of territorial jurisdiction of the Courts at Delhi over criminal offenses, emphasizing that every offense should be tried by a court within the local jurisdiction where it was committed. The accused persons challenged this jurisdiction, leading to the complaints being returned for filing in the appropriate court. The judgment discussed legal precedents and highlighted that lack of territorial jurisdiction in criminal cases is considered an irregularity, not an illegality unless prejudice is caused. It concluded that the complaints would be re-filed in the correct court without imposing any costs. en-us Tue, 09 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 21 Dec 2014 22:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48159 The judgment addressed the issue of territorial jurisdiction of the Courts at Delhi over criminal offenses, emphasizing that every offense should be tried by a court within the local jurisdiction where it was committed. The accused persons challenged this jurisdiction, leading to the complaints being returned for filing in the appropriate court. The judgment discussed legal precedents and highlighted that lack of territorial jurisdiction in criminal cases is considered an irregularity, not an illegality unless prejudice is caused. It concluded that the complaints would be re-filed in the correct court without imposing any costs. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 09 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48159