<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 1431 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781963</link>
    <description>Belated production of Form F was accepted for a branch transfer claim because the transfer nature of the transaction was not disputed and the respondent authority had verified the form. The Court noted the long pendency of the matter and directed consideration of the produced Form F for the specified transaction block, granting only limited relief. The remaining unreconciled transactions were left payable in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2025 08:57:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=866707" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 1431 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781963</link>
      <description>Belated production of Form F was accepted for a branch transfer claim because the transfer nature of the transaction was not disputed and the respondent authority had verified the form. The Court noted the long pendency of the matter and directed consideration of the produced Form F for the specified transaction block, granting only limited relief. The remaining unreconciled transactions were left payable in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781963</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>