<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 1446 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA AT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781978</link>
    <description>An NBFC that outsources customer onboarding, KYC, application processing, disbursal mechanics, collections and recovery to fintech service providers may be treated as ceding core lending control, because RBI outsourcing directions permit only limited support outsourcing and require the NBFC to retain ultimate sanctioning, compliance and operational control. Where the lending structure routes funds through merchant accounts, deducts processing fees and is associated with alleged abusive recovery practices and other unlawful activity, the resulting sums may be characterised as proceeds of crime for enforcement action. The text states that, on the facts described, the outsourcing model and the fund flow supported attachment and related findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2025 08:57:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=866692" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 1446 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA AT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781978</link>
      <description>An NBFC that outsources customer onboarding, KYC, application processing, disbursal mechanics, collections and recovery to fintech service providers may be treated as ceding core lending control, because RBI outsourcing directions permit only limited support outsourcing and require the NBFC to retain ultimate sanctioning, compliance and operational control. Where the lending structure routes funds through merchant accounts, deducts processing fees and is associated with alleged abusive recovery practices and other unlawful activity, the resulting sums may be characterised as proceeds of crime for enforcement action. The text states that, on the facts described, the outsourcing model and the fund flow supported attachment and related findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781978</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>