<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 1452 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781984</link>
    <description>NCLAT (Chennai) dismissed the company appeal seeking interest on the refunded Performance Bank Guarantee (PBG). The Tribunal held that in contractual relationships, the parties&#039; rights and liabilities are strictly confined to the terms and conditions of the contract, which are sacrosanct and cannot be altered unilaterally or expanded by later memoranda. The Letter of Intent/Request for Resolution Plan, under which the appellant furnished the PBG, did not provide for payment of interest on refund of the PBG. As interest was neither a contractual term nor otherwise reserved, the appellant&#039;s claim for interest was rejected and the appeal was found devoid of merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2025 08:57:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=866686" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 1452 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781984</link>
      <description>NCLAT (Chennai) dismissed the company appeal seeking interest on the refunded Performance Bank Guarantee (PBG). The Tribunal held that in contractual relationships, the parties&#039; rights and liabilities are strictly confined to the terms and conditions of the contract, which are sacrosanct and cannot be altered unilaterally or expanded by later memoranda. The Letter of Intent/Request for Resolution Plan, under which the appellant furnished the PBG, did not provide for payment of interest on refund of the PBG. As interest was neither a contractual term nor otherwise reserved, the appellant&#039;s claim for interest was rejected and the appeal was found devoid of merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781984</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>