<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 1469 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782001</link>
    <description>Sale proceeds from saree transactions could not be treated as unexplained money under section 69A where the assessee supported the receipts with ledger entries, invoices, bank details and ledger extracts, and the purchaser complied with notice under section 133(6). The Inspector&#039;s verification also confirmed the purchaser&#039;s existence at the stated premises, and the receipts were routed through banking channels with no material showing cash movement or rebutting the transaction evidence. The addition was therefore deleted, and the assessee&#039;s disclosed turnover could not be ignored without proper adjustment to the returned income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2025 08:57:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=866669" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 1469 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782001</link>
      <description>Sale proceeds from saree transactions could not be treated as unexplained money under section 69A where the assessee supported the receipts with ledger entries, invoices, bank details and ledger extracts, and the purchaser complied with notice under section 133(6). The Inspector&#039;s verification also confirmed the purchaser&#039;s existence at the stated premises, and the receipts were routed through banking channels with no material showing cash movement or rebutting the transaction evidence. The addition was therefore deleted, and the assessee&#039;s disclosed turnover could not be ignored without proper adjustment to the returned income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782001</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>